Light Microscopy

Light Microscopy

Light Microscopy (LMRG)

Mission

Our goal is to promote scientific exchange between researchers, specifically those in core facilities in order to increase our general knowledge and experience. We seek to provide a forum for multi-site experiments exploring “standards” for the field of light microscopy.

Questions or interest in joining an ABRF research group?
Current Members
  • Benjamin Abrams - University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Constadina Arvanitis - Northwestern University
  • Tim Chaya - University of Delaware
  • Aarya Vaikakkara Chithran - Seattle Children's Research Institute
  • Richard Cole  - State University of New York, Albany (Retired)
  • Douglas W. Cromey - University of Arizona
  • Natalia Dworak - University of Virginia
  • Joseph Dragavon (EB Liaison) - University of Colorado
  • Corinne Esquibel - Van Andel Institute
  • Kari Herrington - University of California, San Francisco
  • Danielle Hunt - Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health
  • Michelle Itano - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Arvydas Matiukas - SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • Valeria Mezzano - NYU School of Medicine
  • Emery Ng - Virginia Tech
  • Mariana de Niz - Northwestern University
  • Thomas Pengo - University of Minnesota
  • Josh Rappoport - Boston College
  • Mark Sanders - University of Minnesota
  • Pavan Vedula - The Wistar Institute
  • Erika Wee (Chair) - Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • Jian Wei Tay (Co-Chair) - Van Andel Institute
Current Studies and Programs

2026

  • January 2026
    Image Segmentation (summary) (recording) (image/slides)
    ABRF appreciates the presenters, Emery Ng, Tim Chaya, and Erika Wee for developing this helpful program. 

2025

2024

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ABCD series (October – December)

ABRF Bioimaging Community Discussions (ABCD)

Upcoming Schedule (October – December 2025)
Register here

The ABRF Bioimaging Community Discussions (ABCD) continue in October with a series of programs to review currently available commercial AI tools and a pair of “open discussion” sessions for attendees to share their frequently asked questions (FAQ) and discuss potential follow-up programming, including at ABRF meetings next year.

You can choose to register for any of all these events at the link above.

These sessions will be facilitated by members of the ABRF Light Microscopy Research Group (LMRG) with other speakers included for select sessions.  To encourage open and candid conversations, these sessions will not be recorded, however, a summary along with any materials presented, will be posted to the ABRF web site.

We hope to see you at a future program.  Contact us if you have suggestions for future topics.

Prior Studies and Programs

AI in Imaging Core Facilities (list in reverse chronological order):


3D Image Analysis Tools and Reproducibility Event
Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Workshop breakout session recordings:


Nearly 100 attendees participated in this session on 3D image analysis tools and how they can help improve reproducibility,  hosted by the Light Microscopy Research Group.

This event was centered around the LMRG’s ongoing study of reproducibility in 3D image analysis in which we seek to characterize and identify sources of (ir)reproducibility in 3D segmentation. Representatives from several major 3D analysis platforms walked attendees through how to segment and analyze the images from our study and discussed how their platforms support reproducible image analysis.

This program was targeted to people who are interested in learning more about a specific image analysis platform, learning how to use an image analysis tool better, and/or learning about how reproducibility is addressed by these platforms.

If you have questions about the LMRG study, please contact LMRG member Jessica Hornick for more information.


New LMRG Study - Volunteers Needed!

The Light Microscopy Research Group of the ABRF is launching a study to assess reproducibility in quantitative image analysis and needs YOUR help! We are seeking volunteers to segment 3D fluorescence microscope image  sets and provide us with both their analysis and their analysis  strategy. Our goal is not to find novel segmentation algorithms, but to  compare segmentation results and strategies across a broad cross-section of volunteer analysts.

You can help by analyzing  one (or more!) images for us! We need participants from all levels of image analysis experience.  Everyone can participate - from students  to core directors to image analysis experts. See our study website to  find-out more: https://sites.google.com/view/lmrg-image-analysis-study


November 2020 ABRF LMRG/Industry Partner Discussion

The Light Microscopy Research Group and Corporate Relations Committee organized a conversation between light microscopy user groups and corporate partners, including Leica, Nikon, Olympus and Zeiss.  This conversation provided an opportunity for each company to explain how they are being impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and how they are adapting to the evolving needs of their customers.

Date: 11/18/2020
Time: 1:00-2:30 EST
View session recording.

Participants:

Ben Abrams, ABRF Light Microscopy Research Group and Corporate Relations Committee member, Director - Life Science Microscopy Facility Univ. of California Santa Cruz
Rich Cole, ABRF 2020 President, Light Microscopy Research Group member,  Director - Advanced Light Microscopy & Image Analysis Core, New York State Dept. of Health Wadsworth Center
Joshua Rappoport, ABRF Light Microscopy Research Group member,  Executive Director - Research Infrastructure at Boston College,  Secretary – Core Technologies for Life Sciences
Michelle Itano, Director, UNC Neuroscience Microscopy Core Facility

Leica:
Greg Eppink General Manager Microscopy
Ryan Hrejsa, Senior Marketing Manager

Nikon:
Mike Gallo, General Manager, Service
Mike Johnson, Senior Regional Manager, Sales
Lynne Chang, Senior Marketing Manager

Olympus:
Shane Andrews, Manager, Sales Research Market, Life Science, Olympus Corporation of the Americas Scientific Solutions Group
Kerry Israel, Manager, Marketing Communications, Life Science, Olympus Corporation of the Americas Scientific Solutions Group

Zeiss:
Joseph Huff, Head of Marketing, North America, Zeiss Research Microscopy Solutions
Rosey Manser, Head of Business Development for Core Facilities

Studies

1) The third study of the Light Microscopy Research Group (LMRG) is aimed at creating a 3D biologically relevant test slide and imaging protocol to test for: (1) System resolution and distortions in 2D and 3D. (2) The dependence of Intensity quantification and image signal-to-noise of the microscope on imaging depth. (3) The dependence of the microscope sensitivity on imaging depth. The test sample consists of a mixture of fluorescence microspheres imbedded in a 120 um-thick layer of CyGel (BioStatus, UK, Cat# Cy10500) with a refractive index of 1.37 closely matched to biological tissue. A double-sided adhesive 18 mm square spacers with a well (9 mm diameter, 120 um deep) were used for the sample preparation (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Cat# 70327-8s). The mixture of microspheres includes 1 um Orange, 2.5 um Green 20% brightness, 2.5 um Green 100% brightness, 6 um Far Red 36%, 6 um Far Red, 15 um Blue Core/Orange Ring.
 

Activities

1) ABRF2014 LMRG Group and CCMA Travel Award Winners
Richard Cole, John Russ, and Claire Brown (2,464K)
CCMA Travel Award Winners (1,934K)
2) ABRF2013 LMRG Photo
ABRF2013 LMRG Photo
3) ABRF 12 RG group photo
2012 Meeting Group Photo
4) ABRF 12 RG intro talk
- LMRG 2012 Overview Talk
5) ABRF 12 RG data talk
Study #2 Presentation (7,190K)
6) Proteomics workshop-- Get on Your Way to Microproteomics with laser Microdissection
Proteomics - Sarah Baxter
7) Proteomics workshop-- Sample prep
Tissue Proteomics Sample Preparation Leica Talk
8) ABRF 11 LMRG group photo
View Document (3,315K)
9) ABRF 11 RG talk
View Document (13,284K)
10) ABRF 2010 talk
View Document (4,643K)
11) Talk for ABRF 09
View Document (10,567K)
 
Publications
  1. Microsc and Microanal. 2013 Dec;19(6):1653-68.
    Cole, RW, Thibault, M, Bayles, CJ, Eason, B, Girard, AM, Jinadasa, T, Opansky, C, Schulz, K, Brown, CM,
  2. Microsc Microanal. 2011 Aug;17(4):598-606.
    Stack RF, Bayles CJ, Girard AM, Martin K, Opansky C, Schulz K, Cole RW.Microsc Microanal.
  3. Nature Protocols 6 (2011):1929
    RW Cole, T Jinadasa, CM Brown
Resources

Presentations

Protocols

1) This is a paper written by Cole and Brown and gives a lot of background on how to measure point spread functions, why you may want to measure them, how to prepare bead slides and then a detailed protocol for setting up the instrument and measuring and interpreting the PSF. This article should be looked at first before referring to the specific protocols for the individual microscope platforms.
Nature Protocols Paper (1,371K)
2) PSF Protocol Leica SP5 - Measuring the PSF with the 0.175 um green fluorescent bead sample.
PSF Protocol Leica SP5
3) PSF Protocol Nikon A1 - Measuring the PSF with the 0.175 um green fluorescent bead sample.
PSF Protocol Nikon A1
4) PSF Protocol Olympus FV1000 - Measuring the PSF with the 0.175 um green fluorescent bead sample.
PSF Protocol Olympus FV1000
5) PSF Protocol Zeiss 510 - Measuring the PSF with the 0.175 um green fluorescent bead sample using the AIM software.
PSF Protocol Zeiss 510
6) Spectral Accuracy Protocol Leica SP5 - A mirror slide will be provided and you will look at the reflections of the laser lines into the spectral detector to determine if the wavelength readouts are accurate.
Spectral Accuracy Protocol Leica SP5
7) Spectral Accuracy Protocol Olympus FV1000 - A mirror slide will be provided and you will look at the reflections of the laser lines into the spectral detector to determine if the wavelength readouts are accurate.
Spectral Accuracy Protocol Olympus FV1000
8) Spectral Accuracy Protocol Zeiss 710 - A mirror slide will be provided and you will look at the reflections of the laser lines into the spectral detector to determine if the wavelength readouts are accurate. Uses the ZEN software.
Spectral Accuracy Protocol Zeiss 710 (261K)
9) Spectral Accuracy Protocol Zeiss 510 - A mirror slide will be provided and you will look at the reflections of the laser lines into the spectral detector to determine if the wavelength readouts are accurate. Uses the AIM software.
Spectral Accuracy Protocol Zeiss 510
10) Spectral Separation Accuracy Protocol Leica SP5 - Protocol for spectral separation testing of software un-mixing with double orange stained beads.
- Spectral Separation Accuracy Protocol Leica SP5
Bead Core Spectra Text File
Bead Ring Spectra Text File
Bead Core Spectra lsf File (12K)
Bead Ring Spectra lsf File (9K)
11) Protocol for testing the spectral separation accuracy of the Olympus FV1000.
Spectral Separation Protocol Olympus FV1000 (1,133K)
12) Study #1 Laser Stability, Alignment and Co-registration Protocol
Study #1 Laser Stability, Alignment and Co-registr
13) Improved GFP imaging in live cells
Improved GFP imaging in live cells
 

Publications

  1. Stack, R., Bayles, C., Girard, A., Martin, K., Opansky, C., Schulz, K., Cole, and R.W. (2011) Quality Assurance Testing for Modern Optical Imaging Systems”. Microsc Microanal. 17(4): 598-606. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927611000237. PMID: 21477410
  2. Cole, R.W., Jinadasa, T., Brown, C.M. (2011) “Measuring and Interpreting Point Spread Functions to Determine Confocal Microscope Resolution and Ensure Quality Control”. Nat Protoc. 6(12): 1929-1941. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2011.407. PMID: 22082987
  3. Cole, R.W., Thibault, M., Bayles, C., Eason, B., Girard, A., Jinadasa, T., Opansky, C., Schulz, K., Brown, C. (2013) “International Test Results for Objective Lens Quality, Resolution, Spectral Accuracy and Spectral Separation for Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopes (CLSM)”. Microsc Microanal. 19(6): 1653-1668. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927613013470. PMID: 24103552
  4. Brown, C., Reilly, A., Cole, R.W. (2015) “A Quantitative Measure of Field Illumination”. J Biomol Tech. PMID: 25802488
  5. Adrams, B. et. Al. (2023) Tissue-Like 3D Standard and Protocols for Microscope Quality Management in Microscopy and Microanalysis. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.14.503777
  1. Pengo, T,  et. Al. (2024) Comparison of independent analyses of identical image sets reveals significant analyst-to-analyst variability. In press
Membership History
Member Name Organization Details
Pamela Scott Adams Trudeau Institute Ad hocEB Liaison: 02/09 - 03/10
Carol J Bayles Cornell University Member: 04/08 - 05/15
Claire M Brown McGill University Chair: 03/11 - 04/15
Member: 09/10 - 03/18
Lisa Cameron Duke University Member
Richard Cole Wadsworth Center Chair: 03/08 - 03/11
Arnold M. Falick HHMI-UC Berkeley Ad hocEB Liaison: 03/08 - 02/09
Paul Furcinitti UMass Medical School Member: 05/13 - 12/14
Anne-Marie Girard Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University Member: 02/10 - 05/15
William G Hendrickson Univ. of Illinois, Chicago EB Liaison: 09/13 - 04/14
Jessica Hornick Northwestern University Member through 12/22
Karen R Jonscher University of Colorado Denver Ad hocEB: 04/10 - 03/13
Gary Laevsky Princeton University Member: 01/17-04/19
Karen Martin West Virginia University Member: 12/08 - 05/15
George McNamara U Miami Member: 06/11 - 03/13
Ad hoc: 03/13 - 12/14
Kary Oakleaf Molecular Probes, Life Technologies Member: 06/13 - 12/14
Cynthia Opansky Blood Center of Wisconsin Member: 02/09 - 12/13
James Powers Indiana University Member through 12/22
Joshua Rappoport Northwestern University Member: 03/15-01/19
Katherine Schulz Blood Center of Wisconsin Member: 03/09 - 04/13
Robert F. Stack Wadsworth Center NYSDOH Member: 02/09 - 03/11
Marc Thibault Ecole Polytechnique Member: 06/11 - 03/14
Erika Wee McGill University Chair: 04/15 - 05/18
Frances Weis-Garcia Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center EB Liaison: 05/14 - 04/15
Linda Callahan University of Rochester Medical Center (through 2023)
Guillermo Marques University of Minnesota (through 2023)

Questions or interest in joining an ABRF research group? Contact us